A person's whole employment-related experience is referred to as their quality of working life (QWL). Many authors and researchers have put forth models of quality of working life, also known as quality of worklife, that take a wide range of variables into account. These variables are sometimes categorised as "motivator factors" that, if present, can make working a positive experience and "hygiene factors" that, if absent, are more likely to cause dissatisfaction. The overall quality of working life or specific components of it have been measured using a variety of rating systems that have been established. The significance of QWL for both employees and employers, as well as for the functioning of the national economy, has been highlighted in certain publications. The regular evaluation of work-life quality has the ability to give organisations crucial information on the wellbeing of their employees.
Title : Spillover at the edge: Mapping zoonotic disease risk in the wildland-urban interface
Roman Sharnuud, University of Tennessee, United States
Title : AI for good? Expanding our understanding of opinion leaders in a changing digital landscape
Amelia Burke Garcia, NORC at the University of Chicago, United States
Title : Confidence as care: Empowering under represented voices in public health leadership and community engagement
Sheena Yap Chan, The Tao of Self-Confidence, Canada
Title : Redefining eHealth literacy for the digital age: A scoping review to advance equity, engagement, and behaviour change
Comfort Sanuade, Concordia University, Canada
Title : Innovative approaches in public health leadership: Empowering communities for resilient health systems
Mohammad Kamal Hussain, Umm Al-Qura University, Saudi Arabia
Title : Assessing human exposure to key chemical carcinogens diagnostic approaches and interpretation
Vladan Radosavljevic, Military Medical Academy, Serbia